Despite the announcement that Camilla, Duchess of Cornwall will be Princess Consort by Clarence House upon her marriage to Prince Charles, one constitutional expert believes that Queen Consort is much more likely.
Lord Norton of Louth, a professor at the University of Hull and peer in the House of Lords, is saying otherwise. Speaking to Sky News, he said: “Upon the death of the Queen, Charles automatically becomes King – that is it. His wife will become Queen Consort, formally established by precedent.
“But if she wishes to be known by another title, that’s a matter of royal prerogative, so the monarch could determine that another style will be employed.”
The couple, who just celebrated their 12th wedding anniversary were married on 9 April 2005 in Windsor. At the time, it was announced that upon Prince Charles ascending the throne, Camilla would be given the title of Princess Consort. Many believe this announcement was made, in part, to help smooth the public’s opinion of Camilla.
Others have said that Camilla would only like a title of Princess Consort, and Prince Charles is vying for her to be Queen. Clarence House has not commented on the matter.
The Duchess of Cornwall is an active member of the Royal Family, representing The Queen on many occasions. In 2016, Her Majesty made Camilla a privy councillor.
Over her 12 years as part of the Royal Family, and leading up to her marriage into it, the PR team at Clarence House and Buckingham Palace have worked overtime to win the public’s opinion of her.
She is furiously dedicated to her charity work, but unfortunately, the media is often pre-occupied with her past indiscretions.
Should Camilla not become Queen and only Princess Consort, it could set a dangerous precedent for the future and a trend that may not be broken.
What are your thoughts? Should Camilla be Queen?
I’ve always said, that I will never accept Charles as King simply on the basis of what happened to Diana. I’ve always said, when it comes to Charles, it’s either the the crown or Camilla. Not both! That the crown should pass to William over Charles. My attitude since then has changed, and I’m willing to bend when it comes to Charles as reigning monarch. simply due to the the line of succession. But I’m sorry, Camilla as Queen? That’s a step too far for me. After discussing it with my family, I do believe that Queen Elizabeth will go the way of her mother. The late Queen mother passed at the age of 101. I have a firm believe Queen Elizabeth has another 10 years in her, she’s already in her 90s and will be turning 91 soon. So I firmly believe, Elizabeth will make it to 100. Possibly 101. But as far as Charles is concerned and Camilla, I’ll gladly bend as King Charles is crowned, but don’t ask me to support Princess Camilla or Queen Consort Camilla in any fashion. I’ll forever be #TeamDiana.
NO, NEVER, Camilla should not ever be a queen or a princess, if King Edward had to abdicate because he married a divorcee, then why not the same with Charles???
Neither of them deserve to be there. God bless Queen Elizabeth .
I definitely believe Queen Elizabeth will live past 100. Maybe make it to 101… or 102. Maybe. But definitely, she’s strong enough and has another 10 years in her. As for Camilla, I’ll never accept her on the throne as Queen, Queen Consort, Princess Consort, Queen or Princess anything! #TeamDiana Because of the line of succession, okay, I’ll….. whatever, I’ll accept that. But Camilla,……NO!……. NO!…… NO!……NOPE! Can’t do it…. NOPE! Sorry. NOPE! #TeamDiana #TeamCambridge #TeamKate #TeamWillandKate #TeamHarryandWillandKate
# crazy. She will be queen consort. Deal with it. And Charles will be king. William will have to wait hie turn. And besides Wallace Simpson was a dried up twice divorced and no hope of providing an heir. Look at the time it was. Look how long Charles’s had to wait…….what has to be changed is the sovereigns power to decide who gets married to who. Think of princess Margaret. It’s is what it’s is
I agree, but it was “Wallis,” not “Wallace.”
Really? I thought it was “Wallace”. I thought I’d read that somewhere. Awful name I think. Who would name a girl “Wallis” or “Wallace”?
Granted, Charles will be King. But in my previous statement below, I stated that I firmly believe HM Queen Elizabeth II has another 10 years in her. She’s strong, like her mother. The late Queen Mother. She passed in March 2002 at the age of 101 after being born in August 1900. HM Queen Elizabeth is currently 90, soon to be 91 in June. Charles is currently 68. If HM Queen Elizabeth II surpasses 100, that means Charles will be 78 by then, near 80 by the time he reaches the throne. The monarchy is a line of succession. What I’m saying is, unless certain circumstances change, yes, granted, the throne will naturally pass to Charles. And I’m willing to accept Charles as King, for the sake of the succession rule and for the peace of the country. But accepting Camilla, I’m sorry, I just can’t! Despite Charles’s indiscretions with Camilla even during his marriage to Diana, the fact remains, no matter what Camilla does to turn public opinion around, the fact will always remain that she is indefinitely “the other woman”! Plain and simple. HRH Princess Margaret couldn’t marry the man she loved, because Elizabeth forbade it. Wallis-Simpson was twice divorced because of prior marriages to men, who didn’t know that you can’t hit a woman. But i digress. Most monarchy believe in blue blood marrying blue blood. Royal marrying royal. Aristocrats marrying aristocrats. It’s only in recent years royals are marrying commoners. But still, while I’ll begrudgingly accept Charles as King, okay fine… whatever. Camilla as queen? Nope! Can’t do it!
It’s not so much that the Queen forbade Margaret to marry Group Captain Peter Townsend, Constitutionaly she could not and the queen had to ” enforce” it, however HRH Princess Margaret was given the choice to leave everything that she knew in order to marry GC Peter Townsend or obey her sister and not marry
Holders of Royal titles do not require your acceptance.
True, they don’t. But we’re discussing what we think.
The problem with royals marrying royals in the 21st century AD is that there aren’t a lot of them to go around. At one time, every country had a king or royal ruler. Now, with royalty giving way to democracies all over the world, and with Queen Elizabeth being sovereign over so many countries, where are you going to get the royals to marry other royals?
The children of presidents and prime ministers aren’t royal.
Even in King Edward’s day, there were those who said he should marry whoever he loved. As it was, Wallace Simpson became a duchess. Not bad for a twice-divorced commoner.
I’ve seen both movies “Whatever Love Means” and “Diana Queen of Hearts.” According to the movie, “Whatever Love Means”, Charles proposed to Camilla and she turned him down because she was happy being mistress; she wanted no part of being queen.
Now she’s married Charles. She might just get what she said she didn’t want.
Anyway, we’re not just talking tiaras here. We’re talking people, with feelings and lives. How would any of us like to be told we had to marry someone who had nothing in common with us, and especially if we had a lover already?
At the time I heard what Charles was doing to Diana, I had no respect for him and said I’d never forgive him. But never is a long time.
As I said, I adore Diana. I would have made a better partner for her, I think, especially since my own broken marriage paralleled hers, except for the fact I didn’t get a title. She needed someone to look after her emotionally, and Charles couldn’t or wouldn’t do it. My late ex was the same.
Wallace ( Betsy) Simpson was a Security Threat. That woman was dangerous.
And… And divorced TWICE…
If you except Adultery between two people and the one that was just married and had two sons try to be a faithful and loyal whole life and you keep a marriage together when Three’s a Crowd then that is you I go with what the Bible says adultery is against the law of God and if Camilia is Queen and Charles become king then it goes against all religion and he should abdicate and step aside for his eldest son it is only right that it should be so….
That is very true.. Both adultery and divorce should NEVER be tolerated or rewarded.
But that other thing was getting real chummy with Hitler, etc. She was just bad news all the way around…
Oops, sorry. My reply about adultery was to your post, Penny. I have a feeling Charles won’t get the throne because of what he did to Diana.
Someone will say “Well she had affairs, too”. Yes. When it was clear Charles had no intention of being faithful to his wife, a young girl.
Did you know that the night before Charles married Diana, he spent that night with Camilla.
He says he only got back with her when his relationship with Di broke down. Fact is, Camilla was always on the scene in one way or another.
If I think about Camilla as she relates to Diana, I feel like I can’t accept her. But if I were to think of her now, 20 years after Diana’s death, I feel like, well, she might as well use her Princess of Wales title. I wonder if, after Di, will any woman use that title again?
Well, I’ve thought of that adultery thing, too.
Charles may not get the chance. If he isn’t fit to rule when his mom passes because of some illness, then William will be king. God has a way of taking care of things.
I have a gut feeling that Her Majesty
is going to live for a long time. I’m betting on at least 10 years.
That pins Chas at 80??
>>
if King Edward had to abdicate because he married a divorcee, then why not the same with Charles???
>>
Because Edward married a commoner, whereas Charles married Camilla, who is an aristocrat.
Suck it up people!! Charles will become King and Camilla his queen. Queen Elizabeth now approves of her and that is very telling. The only way William would become king is if Charles abdicates and he is not going to do that. You can wish all you like but it’s not going to happen! Also you don’t know what the situation was between Diana and Charles – she was not blameless you know! Royal protocol has been established for centuries – Charles WILL BE KING and his wife automatically Queen.
I Agree
I agree
Did Prince Philip become King when he married Queen Elizabeth. .. NO. Why should Camilla get the title of QUEEN. She should keep the title she has already
Simple, a king overrules a queen. That’s why he was never given the title. If a queen succeeds the thrown, her husband will never be king.
OK, but Diana was a young girl when Charles married her. I really doubt that he sat her down and said, “Listen, Di, I have a mistress. Can you live with that?”
As far as that particular thing goes, I believe the larger blame rests on Charles. Diana was a virgin, and very naïve, like any virgin young girl with romantic notions. And she wasn’t told the whole truth.
At my age, 51, if some royal took a liking to me and said he had a mistress, could I live with that? I’d say, Hell yeah.
But not at nineteen.
But like I said, Diana died 20 years ago. Charles and Camilla waited a long time, and I think she should be given her due.
If Charles becomes King, Camilla should be Queen consort, it is the way it has been so it should remain, if Henry viii can have 6 wives hold the title, Camilla has the right to be Queen consort
She has enough sense to know to he called Princess Consort. THe country would go mad if she were titled Queen Consort as even too close to sacred QE. Queen Consort Catherine however thats what the world wants
Rubbish. She will be Queen Consort as she deserves to be. The Diana was faultless brigade and the so called Christians who are self-righteously harking back to the 16th century need to wake up and join the 21st century. Their acid remarks show them for the small minded, judgemental and biased creatures that they truly are.
Please do not let Camilla who destroyed the marriage of Diana to be queen. If Charles had any morals, he should abdicate the throne. The thought of queen camilla is just too disgusting…..
I liked Princess Diana but I think she did as much to destroy her own marriage as anyone else and never learned that despite the popularity, (largely because of the glamourous figure she became) she needed to play second fiddle not conduct.
Technology, she IS the Princess of Wales.. She did not want that title. Smart move.
As Charles stated awhile ago, His window of opportunity is slowly closing and depending on how many more years the Queen remains on the Throne Charles could be in His mid to late seventies. When The Queen does leave the Throne, if Charles is in His late seventies and uncertain of His longevity should He become King at a cost of Millions of Pounds to the People of Great Britain for the Ceremony or should He step aside for William?
Charles is currently 68. If HM Queen Elizabeth II goes the way of her mother, the late Queen Mother who passed at age 101, Charles will be 78 by then. Almost 80. Meaning, his reign will last……. maybe……… 15, or 20 years. William’s reign won’t be as long as HM Queen Elizabeth’s. The only 2 longest reigning monarch’s in England have been Victoria and Elizabeth’s. I doubt we’ll ever see anyone reign as long as them
An adulterer, murderer and divorced king on the throne was bad enough, that’s why Edward VIII wasn’t allowed to remain with Wallis Warfield Simpson twice divorced. Besides Edward was unqualified and he knew it. He was also a Nazi sympathizer and dangerous to the crown and England, the government was aware.
HMQEII needs to pass the crown directly to the next king and queen, William and Catherine Elizabeth bypassing the two adulterers, chuckles and cowmilla. Enough is enough. How they can hold their heads up in public and go meet Pope Francis is sacrilegious.
Sorry, but the succession is not in the gift of the monarch. It is governed by Parliament, and, whatever HM’s wishes, Charles cannot be bypassed in the succession except by act of Parliament or his preceding his mother in death.
Anything is possible. Based on polling, if the PMs determine the country will not accept that Parker- Bowles woman, they may vote to bypass chuckles altogether. They should be kicked out of the royal family and the country as Edward was but w/o compensation. They cannot be divorced and Defender of the Faith for crying out loud. Remember Henry’s split with the Pope? Amazing how the country’s morality level has declined so low as to allow not just one but two morally corrupt “royals” to be leaders of the commonwealth. The commonwealth does not favor cowmilla last I heard.
No, it isn’t possible at all. The succession to the throne has firm rules, and it’s not a popularity contest or something to vote on. Her Majesty cannot choose her successor the way some of the Arab monarchies do.
As for the monarch being Defender of the Faith, you are forgetting that the Church of England was established because a King wanted to divorce and remarry. Besides, in the eyes of the Church, Prince Charles is a widower; not divorced.
Like it or not, the next monarchs of the United Kingdom will be King Charles III and Queen Camilla.
Wait a sec. It’s true that Henry VIII started the church of England, but if you fast-forward three or four hundred years, it still seems that that church says divorce is wrong.
Revolutions have been fought for less. The French don’t have a royal family. They revolted, and Marie-Antoinette and Louis found themselves on a chopping block. Kings rule by the sufferance of the people. And whether you believe it or not, God sets up kings and dethrones them. If God decides that Charles is the next king, then he is, regardless of our feelings. But if God has decided to deprive Charles of the crown, he can do it, no problem. All that has to happen is his mother outlives him or he becomes unfit to rule because of an illness such as Alzheimer’s. I’m not wishing anything on anyone. Just saying.
And which god would that be? Just asking.
Stop trying to equate Christianity with Islam. From Saudi Arabia, to Chechnya, to Orlando, to the Netherlands, to Iran, to Malaysia….there’s a new homophobe in town (Islam) that will make the old homophobes (some dopey Christian preachers) look benevolent by comparison. The concentration camps are back.
Christians vigorously deny the existence of thousands of gods claimed by other religions, but get outraged when someone questions the existence of theirs. Okay.
Extremists of any kind who hijack a religion to advance their own hateful agenda all look the same to me. Plenty of “dopey Christians” have participated in persecuting, beating, legislating against, and killing LGBT folks for millennia. Their victims don’t care much about which god their persecutors pray to.
You need to get over your obsessive dislike of the future King & Queen based on your personal admiration of the late Princess Diana and your interpretation of public morals, the church etc. You’ll be consumed by your own vitriol!
Actually ALL the Parliaments in Nations with the British Monarch as Head of State would have to simultaneously pass such a law ! *Good luck with THAT*…
Really? Why would the British Crown have to appeal to the Canadian government, for instance, on a matter that, in the end, doesn’t really affect our daily lives?
Because it would be a ‘Consitutional change, in just the same way the recent ending of ‘Male Primogeniture’ was. ALL Parliaments of ‘the Realms’ would have to agree on it.
She was christened Bessie Wallis, Wallis being her father’s middle name.
I do believe Pope Francis may be far more forgiving than you, or many of the commenters here.
Chuckles and Cowmilla. Too funny. LOL I think we’d all breathe a sigh of relief if Queen Elizabeth bypassed her son in favor of her grandson and his wife. There’s just too much dirt in the Charles/Camilla thing. I think William and Catherine would be a nice clean breath of fresh air. Even after 20 years, people’s hearts are with Diana; mine is, though I’d accept whatever ends up happening. At least William and Catherine are clean.
Don’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen. Her Majesty cannot play a part in the succession, no matter what her personal feelings might be.
Long live The Princess of Wales, Diana The peoples Princess!
i think the monarc will not be popular with charles king and defo will not except his wife , they both done to much damage with both having affairs in both marriages through out , camilla should of walked away once charles was married but obvioulsy she helped charles choose his bride on the purpose she would turn ablind eye to the affair , shes just not done damage to thier people but to dianas children , she destroyed thier family as we know in divorces for children get hurt to , even tho they keep it to themselfs . very selfless of them both . its history shes a hated woman and all the damage she done , but both are to blame , i just hope the queen outlives charles , she knows what the people think of him
No! She shall not. Let them stick to what they had announced back in 2005. What’s going to add for her to be styled as Queen?
Not to mention, Queen Elizabeth would be, by the time of her death, the Monarch ‘Queen’ who reigned for more than 70 years, as anticipated. It would be hard for the it’s subjects to swallow a new styles Queen, even if she was a consort one, and especially, she isn’t the mother of the other future king, Prince William, and and isn’t related to the now popular members of the royal family, Prince Harry, Prince George, Princess Charlotte & the duchess of Cambridge. Diana’s legacy still exists. There’s no need for Camilla to be Queen, it’s enough for her, to be attributed to the totals for more than 12 years now, and takes Diana’s presumptive place.
for its subjects*
To swallow a new styled*
To be attributed to the royals *
What rubbish! Camilla is extremely popular with Charles’ children and grandchildren because she is naturally a kind and warm-hearted person who they have accepted and formed a bond with.
The thought turns my stomach, a little. 🙂 May Queen Elizabeth’s reign continue on and on for a long time!
She should be Queen Consort, according to tradition. I think she’ll do us proud!
Committing adultery is already breaking one of the Ten Commandments. And you get rewarded by being queen?
Committing adultery is a sin over all, if by the bible’s standards. And yet, even Trump is President. A serial sexual assault offender. So, sadly anything is possible. Unfortunately.
Oh, how I wish I was a drunk s!ut, serial adulterer… My skinny behind could be the First Lady, Queen or even a President.
Where have I failed?
I think there were two involved. Last time I thought about it I decided one cannot commit adultery alone.
I don’t think she should be queen he marry Diana just to have 2 boys from him n then marry that ugly Carmella he knew what he w as doing with he married the ugly Carmella she’s old I hope this is what she’s going to think of everyday of here life thay s why he married queen Diana in my book that’s what I see she always n will be the queen no matter what that’s why alot of ppl don’t care for her Carmella she to ugly n old to be queen that’s why this will always be on her conscious about Diana long live Diana this is all i got to say n i know they did something to our queen Diana its a cover up and they knows it it’s all over the TV SO I SAY TO YOU PRINCE CHARLES DO WHAT IS RIGHT GOD NEVER SLEEP HIS KNOWS WHAT HAPPEN
I believe Prince Charles would have married Camilla to begin with and bypassed Diana altogether had the monarchy not insisted he marry a virgin. What’s done is done but I will not be upset in the least if Camilla’s title will be queen. I hope it is, and I hope the British people can get on board with it.
Well said. The Diana brigade forget that Charles and Camilla’s relationship goes back to when they were both young and she married Parker-Bowles only after Charles could not get the Queen’s permission to marry the only woman he ever really felt that special bond with. The Queen Mother and her lady-in-waiting, (Diana’s grandmother) Lady Fermoy, hatched the marriage plot as a ‘marriage of convenience’ to provide heirs. They knew of Charles and Camilla’s tryst. Despite her immaturity it is believed that Diana knew this but wanted the title and all that went with it including being future Queen.
Yes, the plot to get Charles to marry a virgin was hatched by the Queen Mother and her mate. Diana must have known only too well why she was to marry Charles because she had known the Royal family all her life. I think they got along pretty well to start with and made the best of it, but unfortunately a marriage is not going to hang together – no matter how Royal – if the couple of nothing in common except their children. People are only too happy to villify Camilla and of course adultery is not right. However, this rose-tinted worship of Diana is totally misplaced. She broke up at least two marriages, she had affairs with several men – one of whom is suspected of fathering Harry – and you will NEVER know if that is true. She wasn’t murdered by anyone, she was killed in a traffic accident BECAUSE SHE DIDN’T WEAR HER SEAT BELT. Later investigations showed that she would have lived if she hadn’t been so silly as to to not wear it. No conspiracy, just a traffic accident and those who don’t think this could happen to her, just look at the statistics! Why should she be exempt from a car crash? Just because her fans want her to have been murdered by the Duke of Edinburgh. Don’t talk such rot. Camilla is going to be legally Queen, regardless of what she is called. Also remember that Camilla is the ONLY one of the three who has NEVER spilled her guts all over the media! Ever. No matter what the tabloids or the women’s mags want to believe, she will never say a word and quite frankly, is the only one who kept her dignity. So everyone who is pure can cast the stones, everyone who has never done a thing wrong in their lives can vent their spite – so guess what? Not one person on this planet is lily white so just get over it.
aitc. IperfHold on. I don’t think anyone says Diana is sinlessly perfect.
OK, she had affairs after some time. Her husband was unfaithful from the get-go.
OK, so was she, later.
As to her death, investigations also state that the driver of the car was intoxicated. Up till this moment, I’ve never heard that she wasn’t wearing a seatbelt. In fact, I heard that she was, and the paramedics had trouble getting past the stupid paparazzi taking photos, while they were trying to save her life. I distinctly remember the documentary I listened to saying they had to get past the vultures (paparazzi), to get her out of the car where she was belted in.
What kind of creeps would interfere with paramedics to get a photo, for goodness sake?
Yes, it was the paparazzi who blocked the paramedics and it is possible that they may have caused her death, not only by this action but by chasing the car in the first place. The driver being intoxicated didn’t help either, and the boyfriend should have known that because he was in the front with the man. No, she was not wearing a seat belt, that came out in the investigation later and it was stated that she may well have survived if she had had it on. Apparently she was tangled in the crumpled back seat along with the bodyguard who was in a seat belt. That is what I read at the time and I still remember that even though it was so long ago.
Just curios … Is there something you like about Camilla? I know she does charity work, and is outspoken about osteoporosis. Following in Diana’s footsteps as it were.
I doubt there are any Camilla fan clubs.
Oh, how they wept at the tragic untimely passing of their “Queen of Hearts”.
Knee-deep they waded through the ocean of flowers before Buck House and Kennsington. Stuffed toys pinned w/ hateful notes of vitriol directed at Charles and even their Monarch.
“They killed you.”
“We will never forget you” was the theme of the hour.
Diana’s grief-stunned boys marched stone-faced behind her catafalque.
The UK wept.
The world wept.
A private service became an international event. The Queen attended. Her family as well.
The national anthem was played first to get it out of the way.
Her brother Earl Spenser stood in the ancient pulpit feet from his Queen, his erstwhile royal brother-in-law and his nephews and mused about “we, your blood kin” to the confusion of most.
At last, her mortal remains sped to her family’s ancient ancestral estate to be buried in her Greek tomb on her private island there to rest awaiting the final trump calling all to the dread seat on the dread day. Never forgotten. NEVER!!!
The mistress hid. She lay beneath rugs and blankets in the rear of HRH’s car to and fro his estate. Everyone knew but no one said. And the Monarch refused to receive her. Until one day …
Then she emerged like a crocus in Spring emerging ever so slowly, moving to her place which once was “Her” place to be in first place. There she sat when “Her” son was married. Now she’s everywhere carrying that HRH which so infuriated those “Never forgetters” when HM took it away from “Her”. She’s a patron. She’s a royal visitor. She a fave of her Gracious & Noble mum-in-law. And all that noise about fearing not, that she’d never be Queen, she’d be Princess Consort, has vanished in the distance like a fading thunderclap.
But we will never forget what they did to you.
We will never forget that is your place.
We will never forget to forget.
We will never …
To the winner the spoils. And you can’t win when you’re dead.
We will never, ever …
Rest in peace, Your Majesty, Queen of Hearts.
Some have not forgotten.
Will NEVER forget.
She does not deserve to honored in any way. She interfered in a royal marriage, why should she be honored?
No Never. The Royal Family would never be the same again.
Camilla is a wonderful woman! She deserves to be Queen consort without a doubt!
NO not even consort..PRINCE CHARLES SHOULD ABDICATE…LEAVE THE THRONE TO PRINCE WILLIAM, NEW YOUNG AND FRESH BLOOD, IDEAS
SOME ONE TO LOOK UP TOO.. CHARLES HAS NO IDEA HOW TO COMMUNICATE TO YOUNG PEOPLE AND NEW IDEA’S AND CAMILLA SHOULD NOT WEAR THE CROWN.
It’s shocking how many people hate Camilla. Charles was forced to marry a woman he didn’t love and neither one of them acted like saints during that marriage. Charles’ family, most importantly his sons, accept Camilla as his wife and life partner, and even the Queen seems to have warmed up to her. Give the woman a break.
My opinion is Charles should not become king. He doesn’t deserve it. William should become King when Queen Elizabeth passes away or steps down.
Camilla will always be unfit to be queen. What crap to reward a known and unashamed adulteress the honour of becoming queen? Charles and Camilla should just abdicate and live their love lives privately without making the subjects share in it.
Don’t get me wrong. I adored Diana and always will. However, Prince Charles and Camilla waited a long time after Diana’s death to get married–a more than decent amount of time. Not only do I think she should be queen, I think she should be able to use her Princess of Wales title. She won it fair and square, in my humble opinion. I think the late Princess of Wales would agree that it’s time to move forward.
The whole lot of them will be beheaded for crimes against humanity before anyone else is crowned. The entire western world Atonist crime families of blue bloods are seeing their last days. BTW Camilla Parker Bowles is also a blue blood as she is the great granddaughter of Edward VII’s mistress, Alice Keppel.