HRH The Duchess of Cambridge
In May, Royal Central launched the ‘Kate Middleton’ campaign in a bid to stop the continuing use of The Duchess of Cambridge’s maiden name by the press and on social media. Now Her Royal Highness is the mother of a future king, it seems more important than ever that we eradicate the use of her former name.
On Twitter I have found a lot of support. One tweet likening the use of Her Royal Highness’s old name to calling President Obama ‘Senator’ was retweeted enough times to reach over 14,000 people at last count. Perhaps not many in the wide world of Twitter, but a good sign. Of course there are still those that persist, and even justify the use of The Duchess’s maiden name. Here I’ve decided to challenge three of these ‘justifications’.
It gets better search engine results. All major content management systems enable the publisher to add metadata or keywords to improve the search engine optimisation for a page. These keywords don’t appear on screen, so it’s possible to publish a page which doesn’t use Her Royal Highness’s maiden name, but have it show up in search results.
As already argued by Royal Central, if the media consistently use Her Royal Highness’s correct title, people will get used to it and use it in search engines. To quote Royal Central’s campaign ‘the only way to ‘stop the circle’ IS for media sources to stop using ‘Kate Middleton’, that way, people will learn the correct terms’. The Duchess is unlikely to get another title until her father-in-law, The Prince of Wales, becomes king.
Tweeting ‘The Duchess of Cambridge’ uses too many characters. The official British Monarchy account, Clarence House, Royal Central, myself and many others all manage to tweet about Her Royal Highness without using her maiden name. Although it isn’t strictly right, a popular alternative ‘Duchess Kate’ uses less characters (12) than “Kate Middleton’ (14). Abbreviating The Duchess of Cambridge to ‘DuchofCamb.’ uses only ten characters, ‘HRH Kate’ is nine!
Who cares? It doesn’t matter. Every individual deserves the respect of being addressed by their chosen name. How would you feel if people refused to use your married name? If I was happily married and had gladly taken my partners name, I’d be fairly annoyed! As a working member of the Royal Family, future queen and mother of a king, Her Royal Highness deserves to be addressed correctly.
Spot on! I find it disrespectful as well as diminishing to her role as Duchess and future Queen.
Her name is part of who she is, her history, her family and how she got here. She married. She was not reincarnated. She is Kate Middleton because that is who she is, and the Duchess of Cambridge because she married the Duke of Cambridge. No one should take offense at being called by their given name. That is ridiculous!
Yet if she ever gets divorced, but chooses not to resume her birth surname, I’m sure Royal Central will ignore her wishes and insist on her being called Kate Middleton. I’ve seen that hypocrisy regarding Sarah, Duchess of York.
Well Sarah, Duchess of York is divorced and does now choose to go under the name Sarah Ferguson again, if you aren’t convinced, simply check what her name is on Twitter. It is perfectly correct to refer to her as Sarah Ferguson and we are perfectly correct to reflect this on our site.
To receive the latest Royal Central posts straight to your email inbox, enter your email address below and press subscribe.
Join 389 other subscribers